On issues concerning the non traumatic as an factual aspect of the accident at work

Abstract

The non-traumatic injury is examined as a particular case of work accident. It is a disease – a deviation from normal health conditions, which is not caused by trauma but is related to extreme work conditions. The study proves that a non-traumatic injury could be qualified as a work accident, in case there is a functional connection with the work conditions. The specifics of the non-traumatic injury as well as the complicated administrative and judiciary practice of qualifying it as a work accident and determining its relation to the work conditions, justifies a necessity for improvement of the legislation.

References:

Angusheva, Vanyusha. Ponyatieto „trudova zlopoluka“. God. SU. Yurid. fak., 67, [1976], 1977, No 1, 109–150.

Gevrenova, Nina. Zdravoslovni i bezopasni uslovia na trud. [Normativni aktove. Sadebna praktika. Administrativna praktika. Prilozhen komentar]. Sofia: IK Trud i pravo, 2003. 576 s. (Avt.: § 2; § 3, t. І – 1, 3, 5 i 6, t. ІІ – 8; § 4; § 6, t. ІІІ). (Saavt.: Sredkova, Krasimira, Yanev, Ivan).

Genova, Yaroslava. Osigureni litsa v DOO. Sofia: Siela, 2010. 372 s.

Mingov, Emil. Obezshtetenia pri vremenna nerabotosposobnost. Sofia: Sibi, 2002. 220 s. (Bibliogr.: s. 205–206).

Mingov, Emil. Ponyatiyata „nerabotosposobnost“ i „netrudosposobnost“ v balgarskoto osiguritelno zakonodatelstvo. Savremenno pravo, 2001, No 2, 22–33.

Mrachkov, Vasil. Imushtestvena otgovornost na rabotodatelya pri smart ili uvrezhdane na zdraveto na rabotnika ili sluzhitelya. Sofia: Sibi, 2013. 296 s.

Mrachkov, Vasil. Osiguritelno pravo. 6. prerab. i dop. izd. Sofia: Sibi, 2014. 504 s.

Sredkova, Krasimira. Osiguritelno pravo. 5. prerab. i dop. izd. Sofia: Sibi, 2016. 648 s. (Azbuchen ukazatel: s. 642–647).

Vasilev, Atanas. Imushtestvena otgovornost na rabotodatelya za vredi ot trudova zlopoluka i profesionalno zabolyavane. Sofia: Interyus, 1997. 80 s.