Flowers to learn method
designing learning projects a phenomenological study from the students’ perspective
Ключови думи :
teacher training, pedagogy, curriculum, visual thinking, learning process, project, method Flowers to learn (FtL), phenomenology approachАбстракт
This research responds to the need to reflect on how to interweave curricular theory with teaching practice in initial teacher training. This study proposes some keys to respond to this possible dichotomy between theory and practice in teaching with the creation and implementation of the Flowers to learn the pedagogical method. This method is structured based on teaching practice with a professional commitment to respond to the demands of a changing society. This involves learning to design contextualized projects that generate creative processes and meaningful learning experiences capable of provoking the mobility of resources and the transfer of knowledge. We want to know how students perceive and express their experiences and expectations of learning with Flowers to learn. In order to carry out the research, two semi-structured open-ended qualitative interviews were implemented among students of the Primary Education degree in the Teacher Training Centre La Inmaculada, University of Granada (Spain). We have a sample of 207 participants. This design offers the possibility for the students to express opinions, points of view and interactions that provide content and depth to the discourse. It is a study based on a qualitative methodology from a phenomenological design, which favors the emergence of peculiar structures and forms of articulation of the participants‘ educational events. From the analysis, five categories are established: motivation, learning experience, vizualization, comprehension, organization and difficulty. Subsequently, the following subcategories resulting from the analysis of the categories are presented. These are teaching differently, new ways of learning, sustainable learning, transfer, reflection, critique and awareness. It concludes with conclusions and discussion for improvement in teacher education.
Библиография:
Berger, J. (2016). Modos de ver. [Ways of Seeing]. Editorial Gustavo Gili.
Brinkmann, M., Buck, M. F., & Sales, S., (2017). Pädagogik - Phänomenologie. Verhältnisbestimmungen und Herausforderungen. Berlin: VS Springer.
Bolívar, A. (2010). Competencias básicas y currículo. Editorial Síntesis.
Costa, V. (2018). Fenomenología de la Educación y la formación. Sígueme.
De la Herrán, A., & Fortunato, I. (2019). ¿Por qué desde la didáctica no se favorece la formación del profesorado? [Why from teaching the teacher s training is not favored?] Editorial Revista Boletín Redipe, 8(11), 23-43. Recuperado el 30 de noviembre. https://doi.org/10.36260/rbr.v8i11.844
Domingo, J. & Pérez, M. (2015). Aprendiendo a enseñar. Manual práctico de didáctica. Ediciones Pirámide.
Egan, K. (1999). La imaginación en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje, para los años intermedios de la escuela. [Imagination in teaching and learning. The middle school years]. Buenos Aires: Ed. Educación; Agenda Eduactiva.
Gimeno, J. et all (2008). Educar por competencias, ¿qué hay de nuevo? Madrid, Morata.
Hernández-Hernández, F., & Sancho-Gil, J. (2019) Sobre los sentidos y lugares del aprender en la vida de los docentes y sus consecuencias para la formación del profesorado. Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 23(4), 68-87, DOI: 10.30827/profesorado. v23i4.11510
Han, B. (2019). Loa a la tierra. Un viaje aljardín. [Lob der Erde. Eine Reise in den Garten] Herder.
Hattie, J. (2011). Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning. Editorial Routledge .
Lippitz, W. & Rittelmeyer, Ch. (1990). Phänomene des Kinderlebens. Beisspiele und methodische Probleme einer pädagogischen Phänomenologie. Bad Heilbrunn: Verlag Julius Klinkhardt.
Lorenzo, M (2011). Didáctica para la educación infantil, primaria y secundaria. Universitas.
Lledó, E. (2019). Sobre la educación: la necesidad de la literatura y la vigencia de la filosofía. Editorial Taurus.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation. Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco.
Moral Santaella, C. & De la Herrán Gascón, A. (2021). Análisis de contenido y teorías subyacentes en los textos españoles de referencia sobre Didáctica General. [Analysis of content und underlying theories in Spanish reference texts on General Didactics] Revista Española de Pedagogía, https://revistadepedagogia.org/
Pinar, W. (2014). La teoría del currículum Madrid: Narcea.
Prange, K. (2005). Die Zeigestruktur der Erziehung. Grundriss der Operativen Pädagogik. Schöningh, Paderborn.
Rodríguez, Ma I. & Medina, J. (2010). Fundamentos pedagógicos del método de encuesta. Editorial Davinci.
Rodríguez, Ma I. (2018). Breve introducción a Flores para aprender FpA https://isabelrodriguezclavesparaeducar.com/2018/04/02/flores-para-aprender/
Rodríguez, Ma I. (2019). Flowers to Learn. A logical model for the development of the curriculum. 7th Annual International Conference on Education. Cal State University Fullerton, California.
Rodríguez, M.I. (2019). Flores didácticas para la enseñanza en la formación del profesorado. In: T. Sola, et all (eds.). Innovación educativa en la sociedad digital (487-497). Dykinson.
Von Manen, M. (1998). El tacto de la enseñanza / The tact of teaching. The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. (1992) / El significado de la sensibilidad pedagógica. Barcelona: Paidós Educador.
