Хармония и метафония

Абстракт

Вокалната хармония и метафонията са два процеса на уподобяване на гласни, коренно различни по своето естество. По-конкретно, смята се, че хармонията представлява пренос на диференциални признаци от гласна в силна позиция към гласни в слаба позиция, докато метафонията предполага точно обратния тип пренос: от слаб към силен елемент. Тази опозиция „силен/слаб“ би могла да бъде дефинирана на базата на фонологични, морфологични или психолингвистични критерии: ударен/неударен, корен/афикс, маркиран/немаркиран, начален/неначален и т.н. Анализирайки различни случаи на вокални асимилации в над 50 езика, говорени в различни краища на света, настоящата студия си поставя за цел да открои и други съществени разлики между двете явления.

Библиография:

Anderson, J., Durand, J. (1993). Segments non-spécifiés et sous-spécifiés en phonologie de dépendance : le yawelmani et les autres dialectes du yokuts. In: Laks, B.,  Rialland, A. (eds). Architecture des représentations phonologiques. Paris: Editions du CNRS, pp. 233-253.

Encrevé, P. (1988). La liaison avec et sans enchaînement. Phonologie tridimensionnelle et usages du français. Paris: Les Editions du Seuil.

Archangeli, D. (1988). Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology, vol. 5, pp. 183-207.

Bakovic, E. (2003). Vowel harmony and stem identity. Rutgers Optimality Archive. [online], pp. 1–35. Available at: http://roa.rutgers.edu [Accessed: 2003]. 

Barnes, J. (2002). Positional Neutralization: a Phonologization approach to Typological Patterns. Ph.D. dissertation. California: University of Berkeley.

Baroni, M., Vanelli, L. (2000). The relationship between vowel length and consonantal voicing in Friulian. In: Repetti, L. (ed.). Phonological Theory and the Dialects of Italy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co, pp. 13-44.

Bec, P. (1968). Les interférences linguistiques entre gascon et languedocien dans les parlers du Comminges et du Couserans. Paris : PUF.

Bec, P. (1995). La langue occitane. 6e édition corrigée. PUF : Paris.

Бояджиев, Ж. (1997). Увод в езикознанието. Пловдив: Христо Г. Данов.

Буров, И. (2010). Гасконският диалект – мост между галороманското и иберороманското езиково пространство. В: Езици и Култури в диалог. София: УИ „Св. Климент Охрид­ски“, с. 81-91.

Burov, I. (2013). Les phénomènes de sandhi dans l’espace gallo-roman. Sofia: Edition de l’Université Saint Clément d’Ohrid.

Буров, И. (под печат). За прозодификацията на афиксите и клитиките. Съпоставител­но езикознание. София: УИ „Св. Климент Охридски“.

Vaux, B. (1996). The status of ATR in Feature geometry. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 175-182.

Geng, K., Mooshammer, C. (2004). The Hungarian palatal stop: phonological considerations and phonetic data. ZAS Papers in linguistics, 37, pp. 221-246.

Goldsmith, J. (1979). Autosegmental Phonology. New York: Garland Press.

Grammont, M. (1939). Traité de phonétique. Paris: Delagrave.

Dell, F. (1985). Les règles et les sons. Introduction à la phonologie générative. 2e édition revue et corrigée. Paris: Hermann.

Dell, F. (1993). Assimilations supralaryngales dans deux parlers de la Chine méridionale. In: Laks, B., Rialland, A. (eds.). Architecture des représentations phonologiques. Paris: Editions du CNRS, pp. 173-185.

Inkelas, S. (1990). Prosodic constituency in the Lexicon. New York: Garland Publishing.

Kabore, R., Tchagbale, Z. (1998). ATR, ouverture et arrondissement vocaliques dans quelques systèmes africains. Faits de langues. Les langues d’Afrique subsaharienne, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 467-490.

Ćavar, M. (2007). ATR in Polish. Journal of Slavic Linguistics, 15, pp. 207-228.

Casali, R. (1995). Labial opacity and roundness harmony in Nawuri. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 13, pp. 649-663.

Kaun, A. (2004). The typology of rounding harmony. In: Hayes, B., Kirchner, R., Steriade, D. (eds.). Phonetically based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87-116.

Kaye, J., Lowenstamm, J., Vergnaud, J-R. (1988). La structure interne des éléments phonologiques : une théorie du charme et du gouvernement. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 17, pp. 109-134.

Clements, G. (1985). The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook, 2, pp. 225-252.

Clements, G. (1988). Toward a substantive theory of feature specification. In: Papers from the Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 18, pp. 79-93.

Clements, G. (1993a). Un modèle hiérarchique de l’aperture vocalique : le cas bantou. In: Laks, B., Plénat, M. (eds.). De natura sonorum. Essais de phonologie. Paris: PUV, pp. 23-64.

Clements, G. (1993б). Lieu d’articulation des consonnes et des voyelles. In: Laks, B.,  Rialland, A. (eds.). Architecture des représentations phonologiques. Paris: Editions du CNRS, pp. 101-145.

Clements, G., Hume, E. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In: Goldsmith, J. (ed). Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford : Blackwell, pp. 245-306.

Ladefoged, P. (1975). A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Ladefoged, P., Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Oxford: Blackwell.

Léon, P. (1998). Phonétisme et prononciations du français. Paris: Nathan.

Lindau, M. (1975). Features for vowels. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 30, pp. 1-28.

Loporcaro, M. (1988). History and geography of raddoppiamento fonosintattico: remarks on the evolution of a phonological rule. In: Certamen Phonologicum. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier, pp. 341-387.

Loporcaro, M. (2000). Stress stability under cliticization and the prosodic status of romance clitics. In: Repetti, L. (ed.). Phonological Theory and the Dialects of Italy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co, pp. 137-168.

Lloret, M-R. (2007). On the nature of vowel harmony: spreading with a purpose. In: Bisetto, A., Barbieri, F. (eds.). Proceedings of the XXXIII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, pp. 15-35.

McCormick, S. (1982). Vowel Harmony and Umlaut: Implications for a Typology of Accent. PhD. dissertation. Cornell University.

Malmberg, B. (1979). La phonétique. 12e édition. Paris: PUF.

Majors, T. J. (1998). Stress Dependent Harmony: Phonetic Origins and Phonological Analyses. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Texas at Austin.

Monachesi, P. (1996). On the representation of Italian clitics. In: Kleinhenz, U.  (ed.). Studia Grammatica 41: Interfaces in Phonology. Berlin: AkademieVerlag, pp. 83-101.

Mohanan, K. (1986). The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Reidel, Dordrecht.

Nespor, M., Vogel, I. (1983). Prosodic structure above the word. In: Cutler, A., Ladd, D. R. (eds.). Prosody: Models and Measurements. New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag, pp. 123-140.

Nespor, M., Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.

Nguyen, N., Fagyal, Z.  (2008). Acoustic aspects of vowel harmony in French. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1-27.

Nikov, M. (1992). Phonétique générale et française. Sofia: Presses universitaires St. Kliment Ohridski.

Ohala, J. (1994). Towards a universal, phonetically-based, theory of vowel harmony. In: ICSLP3. Yokohama, pp. 491-494.

Parkinson, F. (1996). The Representation of Vowel Height in Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation. Ohio State University.

Peperkamp, S. (1996). On the prosodic representation of clitics. In: Kleinhenz, U. (ed.). Studia Grammatica 41: Interfaces in Phonology. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 102-127.

Peperkamp, S. (2002). L’acquisition de la phonologie et ses conséquences pour la théorie linguistique. Habilitation à diriger des recherches, EHESS.

Plénat, M. (1993). Observations sur le mot minimal français. L’oralisation des sigles. In: Laks, B., Plénat, M. (eds.). De natura sonorum. Essais de phonologie. Paris: PUV, pp. 143-172.

Ringen, C., Vago, R. (1998). Hungarian vowel harmony in Optimality Theory. Phonology, 15, pp. 393-416.

Rossi, M. (2005). Un modèle de traits pour la description du système phonologique du latin. In: Essais de phonologie latine. Sous la dir. de C. Touratier. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence, 2005, pp. 11-24.

Rhodes, R. (2010). A Survey of Vowel Harmony with Special Focus on Neutral Segments, Glides and Diphthongs. Prospectus for the Ph.D. in linguistics. Berkeley: University of California.

Rose, S., Walker, R. (2011). Harmony systems. In: The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Second edition. Blackwell Publishing, pp. 240-290.

Selkirk, E. (1978). On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In: Fretheim, T. (ed.). Nordic Prosody II. Trondheim, pp. 111-140.

Selkirk, E. (1980). Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. In: Juncture. Aronoff, M. Kean, M.-L. (eds.). Saratoga: Anma Libri, pp. 107-129.

Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: the Relation between Sound and Structure. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Selkirk, E. (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. In: Phonology Yearbook 3. Cambridge University Press, pp. 371-405.

Szende, T., Kassai, G. (2007). Grammaire fondamentale du hongrois. Paris: L’Asiathèque.

Smith, J. (2002). Phonological Augmentation in Prominent Positions. Ph.D. dissertation. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.

Walter, H. (1975). La dynamique des phonèmes dans le lexique français contemporain. Paris: France Expansion.

Flemming, E. (2004). Contrast and perceptual distinctiveness. In: Hayes, B., Kirchner, R., Steriade, D. (eds.). Phonetically based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, 232-276.

Hyman, L. (1985). A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris.

Halle, M., Vaux, B., Wolfe, A. (2000). On feature spreading and the representation of place of articulation. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 387-444.

Hajek, J. (2000). How many moras? Overlength and maximal moraicity in Italy. In: Repetti, L. (ed.). Phonological Theory and the Dialects of Italy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co, pp. 111-135.

Hayes, B. (1989а). The prosodic hierarchy in meter. In: Kiparsky, P., Youmans, G. (eds.). Rhythm and Meter. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 201-260.

Hayes, B. (1989б). Compensatory lengthening in Moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 2, no. 20, pp. 253-306.

Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory. Principles and Cases Studies. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Hayes, B., Steriade, D. (2004). The phonetic bases of phonological markedness. In: Hayes, B., Kirchner, R., Steriade, D. (eds.). Phonetically based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-33.

Hayes, B., Kirchner, R., Steriade, D. (eds.). (2004). Phonetically based Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hume, E., Johnson, K. (eds.). (2001). The Role of Speech Perception in Phonology. San Diego: Academic Press.

Chomsky, N., Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.

Schurr, F. (1956). La diphtongaison romane. Revue de linguistique romane, 20, pp. 107-144, pp. 161-248.

Ewen, C., Hulst, H. van der (2001). The Phonological Structure of Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jacobs, H. (1993). La palatalisation gallo-romane et la représentation des traits distinctifs. In: Laks, B., Rialland, A. (eds.). Architecture des représentations phonologiques. Paris: Editions du CNRS, 147-171.