On the distinction among public and private law in determining the status of civil law as a branch of private law
Keywords:
private and public law, differentiation criteria, public body, private entity, concession contract, public procurement contract, object and method of regulation, method of authority and subordination, method of equalityAbstract
The present study is to justify the significance of the distinction between private and public law with a view to determining the place of civil law within the system of private law. The assertions that this segmentation has nowadays lost its substance by distinguishing its impact on legislation, on objective law, on legal doctrine, and on law teachings, are consistently disputed. The various theories on the criteria, which this differentiation is based upon, are analyzed in detail, enveloping the range Roman law – contemporary law. The facets of public and private law are compared on many specifications and an original concept of their distinction is proposed. The import of the regulation method is emphasized. Special attention is paid to the shift in the legislator’s concept over the last decade, concerning the capacity in which a public body participates in the concession contract and in the public procurement contract.
References:
Andreev, Mihail. Rimsko chastno pravo. 4. prerab. i dop. izd. Sofia: Nauka i izkustvo, 1971. 424 s.
Fadenheht, Yosif. Balgarsko grazhdansko pravo. Obshta chast. Otdel I. Obektivno pravo. Sofia: Arm. voen.-izd. fond, 1929. XII, 404 s.
Georgiev, Valentin. Publichni pravootnoshenia. Sofia: Siela, 1998. 200 s.
Gerdzhikov, Ognyan. Komentar na Targovskia zakon. Kn. 1. Chl. 1–112. Sofia: Aliena Dochev-55, 1991. IV, 334 s.
Karadimov, Rosen. Audio-vizualnoto proizvedenie. Konkurentsia i balans na prava. Sofia: Siela 2018. 220 s.
Mateeva, Ekaterina. Integratsionno chastno pravo. V: Sbornik dokladi ot Nauchna konferentsia v pamet na dots. d–r Kristian Takov, provedena ot Katedra Grazhdanskopravni nauki na YuF na SU „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“ na 9 yuni 2018 g. Sofia: Univ. izd. Sv. Kliment Ohridski, 2019.
Novkirishka-Stoyanova, Malina. Za rimskia model na razgranichavaneto na publichnoto i chasnota pravo. V: Pravo i granitsi. [Sbornik dokladi ot nauch. konf., provedena ot katedra „Teoria i istoria na darzhavata i pravoto“ na YuF na SU „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“ na 15 may 2018 g.]. Sofia: Univ. izd. Sv. Kl. Ohridski, 2018, 309–341. (Rez. na angl. ez. s. 309). (Sastav.: D. Valchev, S. Groysman).
Novkirishka-Stoyanova, Malina. Ius publicum – ius privatum, V: De jure publico. [Studii po Rimsko publichno pravo]. Sofia: Siela, 2013, 52–81.
Pavlova, Maria. Grazhdansko pravo. Obshta chast. T. 1. Sofia: Sofi-R, 1995. 352 s.
Pavlova, Maria. Grazhdansko pravo. Obshta chast. 2. prerab. i dop. izd. Sofia: Sofi-R, 2002. 680 s.
Rachev, Filip. Obshta teoria na grazhdanskoto pravo. Sofia: Univ. izd. Stopanstvo, 1997. 316 s.
Ruschev, Ivan. Kam vaprosa za dualizma na chastnoto pravo. Savremenno pravo, 2000, No 6, 74-87.
Ruschev, Ivan. Normativnite aktove – iztochnik na chastnoto pravo. Sofia: Albatros, 2008. 352 s.
Sivkov, Tsvetan. Izmeneniyata na Administrativnoprotsesualnia kodeks ot esenta na 2018 g. Sofia: Sibi, 2019.
Sivkov, Tsvetan. Sporazumenieto po Administrativnoprotsesualnia kodeks, Sofia: Siela, 2012. 188 s.
Tadzher, Vitali. Grazhdansko pravo na NRB. Dyal parvi. Sofia: Nauka i izkustvo, 1972. 204 s.
Tadzher, Vitali. Pravoto na darzhavna sotsialisticheska sobstvenost. Sofia: Nauka i izkustvo, 1975. 504 s.
Torbov, Tseko. Sabrani sachinenia. T. 3. Obshta teoria na pravoto. Sofia: Yurispres, 2002. 444 s. (Adapt. na teksta: Georgi Boychev).
Venedikov, Petko. Zapiski po rimsko pravo. [Uchebno pomagalo za studenti-yuristi]. Sofia: Sibi, 1994. 168 s.
Yankulova, Sonya, Teodora Nikolova. Promenite v Administrativnoprotsesualnia kodeks 2018. Sofia: Trud i pravo. 432 s.
Larenz, K. Allgemeiner Teil des deutschen Burgerlichen Recht. 7 Aufl age, 1889, s.2 II.
