Action research in multicultural contexts

Abstract

The study aims to examine the particularities of the action research approach in terms of its application in the context of cultural diversity. The focus on the specific research frameworks analysed in the study is determined by the need to consider and take into account certain ethical dimensions related to the (inter)cultural competence of teams and the dynamics of power in the researcher-participant relationship when planning and implementing research and projects in multicultural settings. Given the inherent interconnection of applied social and educational research with the solution of specific practical problems, consideration of the above aspects would enhance their relevance and usefulness. Parallel to the advantages of action research approach, its controversial aspects have also been discussed in terms of the dominant paradigm in research.

References:

Bizhkov, G. (1995). Metodologia i metodi na pedagogicheskite izsledvania. Sofia: Askoni-Izdat.

Nou Hau Tsentar za alternativni grizhi za detsa – NBU. (2013). Izsledvane na protsesa na deinstitutsionalizatsia: sluchayat  Bulgaria. Pregledan: 03. 03. 2023, ot https://knowhowcentre.nbu.bg/wp-con-tent/uploads/2019/07/Deinstitucionalizacia-Sluchaiat-Bulgaria-first-part.pdf

Nunev, S. (2009). Antidiskriminatsionna i antipotiskashta sotsialna rabota. Savremenna teoria i praktika. Izdatelstvo Paradigma.

Hristov, I. (2018). Tazi kniga razbiva prokrustovoto lozhe na ideologicheskite  nterpretatsii na balgarskata istoria i nastoyashte. V: Lyudmil Georgiev, Kriticheskata psihologia na balgarskata istoria. Sofia: UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“.

Cholakova, M. (2022). Kulturnoto smirenie. Sofia: UI „Sv. Kliment Ohridski“.

Abe, J. (2020). Beyond cultural competence, toward social transformation: Liberation psychologies and the practice of cultural humility. Journal of Social Work Education, 56(4), 696–707.

Dalrymple, J., & Burke, B. (2006). Anti-oppressive practice: Social care and the law. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Danso, R. (2015). An integrated framework of critical cultural competence and anti-oppressive practice for social justice social work research. Qualitative social work, 14(4), 572–588.

Dominelli, L. (2012). Anti-oppressive practice. The Sage handbook of social work, 328–40.

Foronda, C. (2020). A Theory of Cultural Humility. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 31(1), 7–12.

Foronda, C., Baptiste, D. L., Reinholdt, M. M., & Ousman, K. (2016). Cultural humility: A concept analysis. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 27(3), 210–217.

Harrell, S. P., & Bond, M. A. (2006). Listening to diversity stories: Principles for practice in community research and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 365–376.

Healy, K. (2001). Participatory action research and social work: A critical appraisal. International Social Work, 44(1), 93–105.

Koshy, E., Koshy, V., & Waterman, H. (2010). Action research in healthcare. Sage.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of social issues, 2(4), 34–46.

Littman, D. M., Bender, K., Mollica, M., Erangey, J., Lucas, T., & Marvin, C. (2021). Making power explicit: Using values and power mapping to guide power‐diverse Participatory Action Research processes. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(2), 266–282.

O‘Brien, R. (2001). Um exame da abordagem metodológica da pesquisa ação [An Overview of the Methodological Approach of Action Research]. In: Roberto Richardson (Ed.), Teo ria e Prática da Pesquisa Ação [Theory and Practice of Action Research] João Pessoa, Brazil: Universidade Federal da Paraíba. (English version) Available: http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html (Accessed: 20/1/2002).

Pentini, A. A. (2019). Beyond objectivity and subjectivity: the transformative potential of social pedagogical research. EDUCAZIONE. Giornale di pedagogia critica, VIII, 2, 51–80.

Rogers, J. (2012). Anti-Oppressive Social Work Research: Reflections on Power in the Creation of Knowledge. Social Work Education, 31(7), 866–879.

Ross, L. (2010). Notes from the field: Learning cultural humility through critical incidents and central challenges in community-based participatory research. Journal of Community Practice, 18(2–3), 315–335.

Selener, J. D. (1997). Participatory action research and social change. Second edition. Cornell University.

Strier, R. (2007). Anti-oppressive research in social work: A preliminary definition. British Journal of Social Work, 37(5), 857–871.

Tillman, L. C. (2002). Culturally sensitive research approaches: An African-American perspective. Educational researcher, 31(9), 3–12.

Tripp, D. (2005). Action Research: A methodological introduction. Murdoch University.  Retrieved March 16, 2023, from file:///C:/Users/35988/Downloads/Tripp-Actionre-search-amethodologicalintroduction.pdf

Uehara, E. S., Sohng, S. S. L., Bending, R. L., Seyfried, S., Richey, C. A., Morelli, P., ... & Kanuha, V. (1996). Toward a values-based approach to multicultural social work research. Social work, 41(6), 613–621.

Walter, M. (2009). Chapter 21: Participatory action research. Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press.

Willis, A., Allen, W. (2011). The Importance of Cultural Humility in Cross-Cultural Research. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 1, 111–119.

Yan, M. C., & Wong, Y. L. (2005). Rethinking self-awareness in cultural competence: Toward a dialogic self in cross-cultural social work. Families in Society, 86(2), 181–188.

Yeager, K. A., & Bauer-Wu, S. (2013). Cultural humility: Essential foundation for clinical researchers. Applied Nursing Research, 26(4), 251–256.

Zhelezova-Mindizova, D. (2019). Cognitive and metacognitive resource of action research. Proceedings of University of Russe, 2019, 58(11), 93–97.