In search of integrativity of sciences

the principle of supplementarity in the story of Pauli and Jung

Abstract

The story of Pauli and Jung is one of the many examples in search of an integrative explanatory model of the phenomena and principles of universe and man functioning. The differences in the conceptual apparatus, the research approaches and the methods in natural science and humanties have one goal and the integrativeness against the opposition reveals a different direction, which can be effective in the dynamics of the context today. Identity in the concept of lifelong development, the constant change in economic and social conditions, are a challenge that requires a new attitude of critical thinking and at the same time holistic perception to build the necessary resilience and adaptability. Part of the tasks of education is to support this process and the inclusion of topics in this direction can have a positive role.

References:

Bushev, М. (2009). Nepoznatiat V. Pauli. World of Physics, No. 3: 312–327.

Bushev, М. (2014). М. Chetivo s prodaljenie, „137: Jung, Pauli I gonitbata podir edna nauchna idea fi x”. Сhast 1. World of Physics, No. 1: 104–123.

Bushev, М. (2014). Chetivo s prodaljenie, “137: Jung, Pauli I gonitbata podir edna nauchna idea fi x”. Сhast 2. World of Physics, No. 2: 225–247.

Kozhuharova, G., Slavchev, A., & Slavova, M. (2010). Integrirane na uchebnoto sadarjanie po matematika I prirodni nauki v peti klas. (pp. 177–185). In: Mejdunarodna konferencia, posvetena na 60 g. na prof. Sava Grozdev “Sirnergetika I refl exia v obuchenieto po matematika”. Bachinovo, 177–185.

Tzanova, N., Tomova, Sn., Gaydarova, M., Kirova, M., Boyadzhieva, El., Gospodinov, Vl., Raycheva, N., Petkova, Il., & Dzhalev, L. (2013). Pomagalo za pedagogicheski specialist za usvojavane na znania, formirane na umenia i kompetentnosti za oceniavane na uchenicite. Sofi a, University Press.

Atmanspacher, Harald (2012). Dual-aspect monism à la Pauli and Jung. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19:9 (2012), 96–120 Jung, C.G., and Pauli, W. (1952): Naturerklärung und Psyche, Zurich: Rascher.

Atmanspacher, Harald. (2018). Dual-Aspect Monism According to the Pauli-Jung Conjecture. Simbio-Logias: Revista Eletrônica de Educação, Filosofi a e Nutrição, 60-79. 10.32905/19833253.2018.10.14p.60.

Atmanspacher, H. (2020). The Pauli–Jung Conjecture and Its Relatives: A Formally Augmented Outline. Open Philosophy, 3, 527–549; DOI: Retrieved Fabruary 19, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0138

Black, M. (2002). Book review: Atom and Archetype: the Pauli/Jung Letters 1932–1958. Ed C.A. Meier. Preface by Beverley Zabriskie. Trs. David Roscoe. London: Routledge (2001). рp 250 International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 83: 4.

Boeree, G. (2015). Theories of personality, Bulgarian version Retrieved Fabruary 19, 2021 from https://moradabg.com/jung_bg.htm

Busemeyer, J. R., & Wang, Z. (2015). What is quantum cognition, and how is it applied to psychology? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 163–169. Retrieved Fabruary 19, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414568663

Gustafson, J. R. (2004). Wolfgang Pauli 1900 to 1930: His Early Physics in Jungian Perspective. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota. Retrieved Fabruary 19, 2021 from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1003/1003.3223.pdf

Hirsh, J. B., Mar, R. A., & Peterson. J. B. (2012). Psychological entropy: a framework for understanding uncertainty-related anxiety. Psychol Rev., 2012 Apr; 119(2):304–20. doi: 10.1037/a0026767. Epub 2012 Jan 16. PMID: 22250757.

Jung, C.G. (1946). Psychological Types. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner and Co.

Jung, C. (1960). The collected works of C.G. Jung, Vol. 8, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Maraldi, E., & Fernandes, M. (2018). Carl Jung (Biography). Retrieved Fabruary 19, 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330026069_Carl_Jung_Biography.

Meier, S. A. (Ed.) (2001). ATOM AND ARCHETYPE. The Pauli/Jung Letters, 1932–1958. Princeton University Press online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0026767

Snyder, D. M. (1994). On complementarity and William James. American Psychologist, 49(10), 891–892. Retrieved Fabruary 19, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.10.891

Stephenson, W. (1986). William James, Niels Bohr, and Complementarity: I Concepts. Psychol Rec 36, 519–527. Retrieved Fabruary 19, 2021 from https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03394970

Wang Z., & Busemeyer J. (2015.) Reintroducing the Concept of Complementarity into Psychology. Front. Psychol. 6:1822. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01822.

Zabriskie, B. (1995). Jung and Pauli: A Subtle Asymmetry,“ The Journal of Analytical Psychology, 40, 531–53