The USA and the Czechoslovak Borders at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60053/GSU.IF.1.99.217-277Keywords:
Czechoslovakia, First World War, diplomacyAbstract
During the First World War the USA supported the territorial integrity of the Habsburg Empire and did not envisage the establishment of independent states on its place because of the fear of “balkanization” of the region. At the end of the war, when it became obvious that Austria-Hungary could not be detached from Germany, the American government adopted an anti-Habsburg policy and supported the national aspirations of its subjects peoples, in particular, the Czechs and Slovaks.
During the Paris Peace Conference, the American president Woodrow Wilson tried to realize his ideas about postwar Central Europe. In outlining the borders of Czechoslovakia, the American delegation tried to implement the national self-determination principle regarding the national minorities living within it. It confronted with the French position, which based its policy on the establishment of strong states in Central Europe. As a result, the French policy prevailed and the Czechoslovak State was established as multinational.
References
Герцов, З. М. „Нейтралитет“ США в годы Первой мировой войны. М., 1962; Зубок, Л. Очерк США. М., 1956; Йоффе, А. Миссия Рута в России в 1917 году. – Вопросы истории, 1958, № 9.
Ушаков, А. Дипломатия Вудро Вилсона. М., 1989.
Петков, П. САЩ, Световната война и мирната програма на президента Удроу Уилсън. – ГСУ. ИФ, 89–90, 1996–1997. С., 2000.
Пантев, А. „Специалните отношения“ между Англия и САЩ по време на Първата световна война. – История и обществознание, 1986, № 2.
Генов, Г. Ньойският договор и България. С., 1935; Христов, Х. България, Балканите и мирът 1919. С., 1984; Пантев, А., П. Петков. САЩ и България по време на Първата световна война. С., 1983; Petkov, P. The United States and Bulgaria in World War I. New York, 1991.
Пантев, А. Стратегически проект за външната политика на САЩ в края на XIX – началото на ХХ век. – ГСУ. ИФ, 75, 1982; Петков, П. Основни доктрини в американската външна политика в края на XVIII и началото на XIX век. – История и обществознание, 1988, № 5–6, 90–103; Нови акценти в американската външна политика от Гражданската война до Първата световна война. – История, 1996, № 3–4.
Рубинщейн, Е. Крушение Австро-Венгерской монархии. М., 1963.
Трайнин, И. П. Национальные противоречия в Австро-Венгрии и ее распад. М., 1947.
Баева, И. Монархии-республики в Източна Европа през ХХ в. – Исторически преглед, 2003, № 1–2.
Мишев, Р. История на Австро-Унгария, 1867–1918. В. Търново, 2005.
Томовска, Т. Назад към изгубения гр. С., 1996.
Динчева, Д. Войната, революцията, границите (Централна Европа 1914–1920). Случаят с Полша. – Исторически преглед, 1998, № 1–2, с. 82.
Seymour, C. The Intimate Papers of Colonel House. Т. 1–4. Boston – New York, 1926–1928; Daniels, J. The Wilson Era. Years of Peace. 1910–1917. Chapel Hill, 1960; Tumulty, J. Woodrow Wilson as I Know Him. New York, 1921; Seymour, Ch. What Really Happened at Paris. The Story of the Paris Peace Conference, 1918–1919. New York, 1921; Lansing, R. The Peace Negotiations, A Personal Narrative. Boston, 1921; Freud, S., W. Bullitt. Thomas Woodrow Wilson. A Psychological Study. Boston, 1967.
Baker, R. S. Woodrow Wilson and World Settlement. Т. 1–3. New York, 1922.
Gelfand, L. The Inquiry. American Preparations for Peace, 1917–1919. London, 1963; Link, A. Woodrow Wilson: Revolution, War and Peace. Arlington Heights, 1979; Temperley, H. A History of the Peace Conference of Paris. Т. 1–6. Oxford, 1969; Pomerance, M. The United States and Self-Determination: Perspectives on the Wilsonian Conception. – The American Journal of International Law, LXXVI, 1976; Heater, D. National Self-Determination: Woodrow Wilson and His Legacy. New York, 1994; Gamble, R. Savior nation: Woodrow Wilson and the Gospel of Service. – Humanitas, XIV, 2001, 1.
Mamatey, V. The United States and East Central Europe 1914–1918. A Study of Wilsonian Diplomacy and Propaganda. Princeton, 1957; The USA and the Dissolution of Austria-Hungary. – Journal of Central European Affairs, X, October 1953.
Valiani, L. The End of Austria-Hungary. London, 1973.
Kadleč, R. Britain and the Origins of New Europe, 1914–1918. Cambridge, 1976; Fest, W. Peace or Partition. The Habsburg Monarchy and the British Policy, 1914–1918. New York, 1978; Hanak, H. The Habsburg Monarchy, the Foreign Office and Austria-Hungary, 1914–1918. – The Slavonic and East European Review, XLVII, 1969.
Fejto, F. Rekviem za Mrtvou Říši. Praha, 1998.
Glant, T. Through the Prism of The Habsburg Monarchy: Hungary in American Diplomacy and Public Opinion During World War I. New York, 1998; Taraszovicz, S. American Peace Plans and the Shaping of Hungary’s post World War I Borders. – In: Total War and Peacemaking, A Case Study on Trianon. Eds. B. K. Kiraly, P. Pastor, I. Sanders. New York, 1982; Romsics, I. The Great Powers and the Dissolution of Austria-Hungary. – The Hungarian Quarterly, XLI, Autumn 2000, No 159.
Irmanova, E. Konec starého světa. – Slovanský přehled, LXXXVII, 2001, No 4.
Zivojinovic, D. America, Italy and the Birth of Yugoslavia 1917–1919. New York, 1972; The Vatican, Woodrow Wilson, and the Dissolution of the Hapsburg Monarchy 1914–1918. – East European Quarterly, III, 1969.
Galandauer, J. Vznik československé republiky. Praha, 1988.
Hajek, J. S. Wilsonovská legenda v dějinách ČSR. Praha, 1953.
Seymour, C. Czechoslovak Frontiers. – Yale Review, XXVIII, 1938–1939.
Jaszi, O. The Problem of Sub-Carpathian Ruthenia. – In: Czechoslovak Democracy, Twenty Years of Independence. Ed. R. Kerner. Princeton, 1940.
Steed, H. W. Through Thirty Years, 1892–1922. A Personal Narrative. Т. 2. London, 1925.
Beneš, E. Problémy nové Evropy a zahraniční politika československá. Projevy a uvahy z r. 1919–1924. Praha, 1924; Světová válka a naše revoluce. Т. 1–2. Praha, 1935; Nicolson, H. Peacemaking, 1919. London, 1933.
Deak, F. Hungary at the Paris Peace Conference. New York, 1942.
Total War and Peacemaking, A Case Study on Trianon; Magosci, P. The Rutheniana Decision to Unite with Czechoslovakia. – The Slavic Review, XXXIV, 1975, No 2; Ormos, M. From Padua to the Trianon 1918–1920. Budapest, 1990; Major, M. American-Hungarian Relations 1918–1944. Ontario, 1991; Romsics, I. Edvard Benes and the Czechoslovak-Hungarian Border. – The New Hungarian Quarterly, XXX, 1992, No 128.
Borsody, S. Hungary’s Road to Trianon: Peacemaking and Propaganda. – In: Total War and Peacemaking, A Case Study on Trianon. Ed. B. Kiraly, P. Pastor, I. Sanders. New York, 1982.
Callcott, W. R. The Last War Aim: British opinion and the Decision for Czechoslovak Independence, 1914–1919. – The Historical Journal, XXVII, 1984, No 4.
Irmanova, E. Maďarsko a Versailleský mírový systém. Usti nad Labem, 2002.
Gamble, R. Savior nation: Woodrow Wilson and the Gospel of Service. – Humanitas, XIV, 2001, No 1, p. 8.
Герцов, З. М., „Цит. съч.“, с. 28; Според Ch. Beard и M. Beard (The Rise of American Civilization. T. 2, New York, 1947, 614–615) до Първата световна война САЩ сключили тайно споразумение с Англия и Франция за съвместна война срещу Германия, макар официалните американски източници да отричат това.
Křen, J. Konfliktní společenství. Praha, 1990, p. 395.
The Papers of Woodrow Wilson. Ed. A. Link. T. 40. Princeton, 1966, 439–441 (по-нататък вж. PWW).
Mamatey, V. The United States and East Central Europe…, p. 41.
Gamble, R. Цит. съч., с. 12.
Пак там, с. 6.
Documents and Statements Relating to Peace Proposals and War Aims (December 1916 – November 1918). London – New York, 1919, doc. 13, p. 41–42.
Пак там, док. 34, с. 89–96.
PWW, T. 46, p. 40.
Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace, Herron Papers: Austria I, Doc. IV; Herron, G. „Heinrich Lammasch’s Suggestion for Peace in Bern.“ – In: Heinrich Lammasch, seine Aufzeichnungen, sein Wirken und seine Politik. Hrsg. von M. Lammasch, H. Sperl. Wien – Leipzig, 1922, 186–193.
Сискотовата афера е наречена на името на шурея на Карл I Сиск Бурбонски, който посредничи при преговорите за мир между Виена и Париж.
Campbell, S. The Secrets of Crewe House. London, 1947, 25–27.
Documents and Statements…, doc. 57, p. 191.
Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States. 1918. Supplement 1. The World War. Т. 1. Washington, 1933, 808–809 (по-нататък FRUS, 1918, WW 1, Suppl. 1).
PWW, T. 48, 205–206.
Masaryk, T. Nova Evropa. Brno, 1994, p. 147.
Dokumenty československé zahraniční politiky. Vznik československa. Praha, 1994, doc. 41, p. 123.
Пак там, док. 54, с. 142.
Пак там, док. 88, с. 201.
Пак там, док. 104, с. 246.
Пак там, док. 145, с. 306–307.
Пак там, док. 146, с. 307–308 – Лев Сихрав отива във Франция; док. 148, с. 310 – Стефан Осуски – във Великобритания; док. 149, с. 311 – Лев Борски – в Италия.
Пак там, док. 152, с. 315.
Пак там, док. 184, с. 348–349.
Пак там, док. 186, с. 350–351.
Galandauer, J. Karel I…, 258–259; Irmanova, E. Madarsko a Versailleský mírový system, 76–77.
Dokumenty československé zahraniční politiky, doc. 155, p. 317–320.
AUTGM, MA, XV-Amerika, kr. 312, sl. 25.
Documents and Statements, doc. 78, 252–253.
Documents of American History since 1898. Ed. By H. Commager. New Jersey, 1973, doc. 423.
Dokumenty československé Zahraniční Politiky, doc. 170, 332–333.
Пак там, док. 183, с. 347–348.
FRUS, 1918, WW I, Suppl. 1, p. 404.
Dokumenty československé Zahraniční Politiky, doc. 177, p. 340–341.
Mracek, J. Woodrow Wilson a Americké uznani za vladu de facto. Praha, 1933, p. 66.
Pastor, P. The Hungarian Revolution’s Road From Wilsonianism to Leninism, 1918–1919. – East Central Europe, III, 1976, No 2, p. 213.
Мишев, Р. Цит. съч., с. 244.
Mracek, J. Цит. съч., с. 67.
Glant, T. Through the Prism of the Habsburg Monarchy, Appendix C, p. 303.
Пак там, 297–298.
Papers relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States. Paris Peace Conference, 1919. Т. 1. Washington, DC, 1942, p. 81 (по-нататък FRUS, PPC, 1919).
Nosek, V. Independent Bohemia. London, 1918, p. 147.
Jeszensky, G. British Policy towards Central Europe, 1914–1918. – 20th Century Hungary and the Great Powers. New York, 1995, 64–65.
Пак там, с. 66.
Perman, D. Цит. съч., с. 190.
AUTGM, MA, XV-Amerika, kr. 312, sl. 23.
Zahradnicek, T. Masaryk a středoevropská spoluprace (listopad 1917–listopad 1918). – In: TGM, Rusko a Evropa…, 252–253; May, A. The Mid-European Union. – In: The Immigrants’ Influence, p. 259.
Dokumenty československé zahraniční politiky, doc. 168, p. 330–331.
May, A. Цит. съч., с. 251.
AUTGM, MA, XV-Amerika, kr. 312, sl. 25.
May, A. Цит. съч., с. 265.
Zivojinovic, D. America, Italy nad the Birth of Jugoslavia, p. 155.
Seymour, C. The Intimate Papers… Т. 4, p. 105.
FRUS, 1918, WW I, Suppl. 1, 433–434.
Баева, И. Цит. съч., с. 100.
Томовска, Т. Цит. съч., с. 125.
Пак там, 90–91.
Litvan, G. A Twentieth-Century Prophet: Oscar Jaszi 1875–1957. Budapest, 2006, p. 131.
Borsody, S. Oscar Jaszi’s Vision of Peace. – In: Hungary’s Historical Legacies. Studies in Honor of Stephen Bela Vardy. Boulder, 2000, 117–118; Kann, R. The Multinational Empire: Nationalism and National Reform in he Habsburg Monarchy 1848–1918. Т. 1–2. New York, 1983, Т.1, p. 147.
Krizman, B. The Belgrade Armistice of 13 November 1918. – The Slavonic and East European Review, XLVIII, January 1970, No 110, 85–87.
Taraszovics, S. Цит. съч., с. 240.
Deak, F. Hungary at the Paris Peace Conference. New York, 1942, p. 20.
Dokumenty československé zahraniční politiky. Československo na Pařížské mírové konferenci. Praha, 2001, doc. 3, p. 55 (по-нататък: Československo na Pařížské mírové konferenci).
Zivojinovic, D. America, Italy and the Birth of Jugoslavia, p. 172.
Pechota, V. Czechoslovak Constitutionalism. – Czechoslovak and Central European Journal, X, Winter 1991, No 2, p. 4.
Mamatey, V. The Role of President Wilson in the Foundation of Czechoslovakia. – In: Czechoslovakia Past and Present. T. 1. Ed. M. Rechcigl. Hague, 1968, p. 27.
Пак там, с. 29.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 2, 377–378.
Пак там, с. 379.
Československo na Pařížské mírové konferenci, doc. 2, p. 52–54.
Пак там, док. 6, с. 61–63.
Пак там, док. 2, с. 52–54.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 2, 379–383.
Пак там, 376–377.
Пак там, 376–377.
Perman, D. Цит. съч., с. 85.
Bonsal, S. Suitors and Suppliants. The Little Nations at Versailles. Washington, 1946: http://www.hungarian-history.hu/lib/hung.htm
Пак там.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 2, p. 224.
Seymour, C. Czechoslovak Frontiers. – Yale Review, XXVIII, 1938–1939, 273–274.
Rakova, S. Politika Spojených statu ve střední Evropě po první světové valce. Praha, 1983, p. 30.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 2, 379–383.
Irmanova, E. Maďarsko a Versailleský mírový system, p. 99.
Pastor, P. Hungarian Territorial Losses During the Liberal-Democratic Revolution of 1918–1919. – In: Total War and Peacemaking, A Case Study on Trianon, p. 262.
Ormos, M. From Padua to the Trianon 1918–1920. Budapest, 1990, p. 111.
Deak, F. Цит. съч., с. 21.
Пак там, 362–364.
Wandycz, P. S. The United States and Poland. Harvard, 1980, p. 136.
Československo na Pařížské mírové konferenci, doc. 5, p. 58–60.
Пак там, док. 12, с. 68–71.
Perman, D. Цит. съч., с. 105.
Пак там.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 12, p. 675.
Československo na Pařížské mírové konferenci, doc. 89, p. 189.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 12, p. 322.
Wandycz, P. S. Цит. съч., с. 137.
Perman, D. Цит. съч., с. 112.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 12, 313–317.
Beneš, E. Problémy nové Evropy a zahraniční politika československa. Projevy a uvahy z r. 1919–1924. Praha, 1924, p. 66.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 3, 818–822.
Dejmek, J. Československo, jeho sousedé a velmoci ve XX. století (1918 až 1992). Praha, 2002, p. 137.
Československo na Pařížské mírové konferenci, doc. 98, p. 196–197.
Rakova, S. Цит. съч., с. 22.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 1, p. 120.
Пак там, с. 124.
Seymour, Ch. Letters from the Paris Peace Conference, New Haven and London, 1965, p. 4.
Taraszovics, S. Цит. съч., с. 238.
May, A. The American epoch…, 204–205.
Heater, D. National Self-Determination: Woodrow Wilson and His Legacy. New York, 1994, p. 54.
Macmillan, M. Peacemakers: the Paris Conference of 1919 and its attempt to end war. London, 2002, p. 18.
Христов, Х. България, Балканите и мирът 1919. С., 1984, с. 34.
Temperley, H. The United States…, T. 1, 249–250.
Пак там, с. 267.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 1, 156–157.
Macmillan, M. Цит. съч., с. 115.
Wandycz, P. Цит. съч., с. 133.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 3, p. 172.
Пак там, с. 818.
Пак там, с. 87.
Seymour, Ch. Czechoslovak Frontiers, p. 278.
Rakova, S. Цит. съч., с. 39.
Seymour, Ch. Czechoslovak Frontiers, 273–274.
Perman, D. Цит. съч., с. 139.
Seymour, Ch. Letters from…, p. 175.
Macmillan, M. Цит. съч., с. 247.
Seymour, Ch. Czechoslovak Frontiers, p. 277.
Seymour, T. Great Britain and the Making of Treaty of Trianon. – In: Total War and Peacemaking, A Case Study on Trianon, p. 117.
Nicolson, H. Peacemaking 1919. London, 1933, p. 34.
Macmillan, M. Цит. съч., с. 240.
Mamatey, V. The Role of President Wilson in the Foundation of Czechoslovakia, p. 187.
Територията е част от Унгарското кралство. Среща се с имената Русka Крайна, Подкарпатска Рус, Рутения. Географски погледнато, тя е продължение на Словакия. В навечерието на Първата световна война населението там наброявало около 570 000 души. То се смята за най-изостаналото в икономическо и в политическо отношение в Австро-Унгария. Според унгарската статистика от 1910 г. 70–90% от населението е неграмотно. Средната класа е маджаризирана. Няма училища на родния език, липсва какъвто и да е политически живот. В същото време се наблюдавала масова емиграция в САЩ. Именно сред тамошните емигранти се зарежда идеята за автономна на Рутения. След Първата световна война областта е присъединена към Чехословакия, след Мюнхен 1938 г. е дадена на Унгария, а след Втората световна война става част от Съветския съюз.
Československo na Pařížské mírové konferenci, doc. 108, p. 207–210.
Пак там, док. 11, с. 67–68.
Sandor, V. Carpatho-Ukraine in the Twentieth Century. Harvard, 1997, p. 6.
Magocsi, P. The Ruthenian Decision to Unite with Czechoslovakia. – In: The Slavic Review, XXXIV, 1975, No 2, p. 374; Mamatey, V. The Slovaks and Carpatho-Ruthenians. – In: The Immigrants’ Influence…, p. 244.
Československo na Pařížské mírové konferenci, doc. 11, p. 67–68.
Jaszi, O. The Problem of Sub-Carpathian Ruthenia. – In: Czechoslovakia, Twenty Years of Independence. Ed. R. Kerner. Princeton, 1940, p. 203.
Крофта, К. Подкарпатска Рус и Чехословaкия. Прага, 1935, с. 40.
Seymour, Ch. Czechoslovak Frontiers, p. 282.
Walworth, A. Wilson and His Peacemakers. American Diplomacy at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919. New York, 1986, p. 263.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 2, 232–236.
Seymour, Ch. Czechoslovak Frontiers, p. 281.
Taraszovics, S. Цит. съч., 241–242.
Nicolson, H. Peacemaking 1919, p. 279.
Seymour, Ch. Czechoslovak Frontiers, p. 277.
Пак там.
Romsics, I. Edvard Beneš and the Czechoslovak-Hungarian Border. – The New Hungarian Quarterly, XXX, 1992, No 128, p. 100.
Taraszovics, S. Цит. съч., 241–242.
Rakova, S. Цит. съч., с. 52.
Taraszovics, S. Цит. съч., с. 242.
Пак там.
Perman, D. Цит. съч., 153–154.
Пак там, с. 158.
Macmillan, M. Цит. съч., с. 227.
Kerezse, S. The Consequences of World War I: The Effects on East Central Europe. – In: Total War and Peacemaking, A Case Study on Trianon.
Callcott, W. R. The Last War Aim: British opinion and the Decision for Czechoslovak Independence, 1914–1919. – The Historical Journal, XXVII, 1984, No 4, p. 986.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 4, p. 543–547.
Пак там, 544–545.
Callcott, W. R. Цит. съч., с. 988.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 4, p. 545.
Seymour, Ch. Czechoslovak Frontiers, p. 285.
Dockrill, M., J. D. Goold. Peace Without Promise: Britain and the Peace Conferences, 1919–1923. Hamden, 1980, p. 111.
Seymour, C. The Intimate Papers…, p. 402.
Sakmyster, T. Цит. съч., с. 124.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 4, p. 679.
Macmillan, M. Цит. съч., с. 254.
Дзяровски, Л. Правда о мирных договорах. Т. 2, 154–158.
Пак там, 158–161.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, XI, 251–252.
Пак там, 271–278.
Perman, D. Цит. съч., с. 203.
Пак там, с. 204.
Пак там, 205–206.
Temperley, H. Цит. съч. Т. 5, с. 123.
Roweck, J. Czechoslovakia and Her Minorities. – In: Czechoslovakia…, p. 172.
Пак там, с. 179.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 4, p. 16.
Vermes, G. The Agony of Federalism in Hungary Under the Karolyi Regime, 1918/1919. – East European Quarterly, VI, 1973, No 4, p. 501.
Pastor, P. The Hungarian Revolution’s Road From Wilsonianism to Leninism…, с. 218.
Macmillan, M. Цит. съч., 270–271.
Vigh, K. The Causes and Consequences of Trianon: A Re-Examination. – In: Total War and Peacemaking, A Case Study on Trianon, p. 70.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 5, 41–43.
Vigh, K. Цит. съч., с. 70.
Perman, D. Цит. съч., 188–189.
Československo na Pařížské mírové konferenci, doc. 158, p. 268–271.
Romsics, I. Edvard Beneš and the Czechoslovak-Hungarian Border, p. 101.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 6, p. 512.
Пак там, 550–557.
Deak, F. Цит. съч., 231–238.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 9, p. 876.
Гомоаска, Т. Цит. съч., 116–117.
Seymour, Ch. Czechoslovak frontiers, p. 275.
Vigh, K. Цит. съч., с. 76.
Lloyd George, D. The Truth about the Peace Treaties. T. 2, 246–248.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 4, 610–611.
Perman, D. Цит. съч., с. 236.
Пак там, с. 237.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, IX, 336–337.
Beneš, E. Problemy nove Evropy a zahranicni politika ceskoslovenska, p. 65.
FRUS, PPC, 1919, T. 6, p. 287.
Bonsal, S. Suitors and Supplants. The Little Nations at Versailles. Washington, 1946: http://www.hungarian-history.hu/lib/hung.htm
Perman, D. Цит. съч., 248–249.
Borsody, S. Hungary’s Road to Trianon: Peacemaking and Propaganda. – In: Essays on World War I: Total War and Peacemaking, A Case Study on Trianon. Ed. B. Kiraly, P. Pastor; and I. Sanders. New York, 1982, p. 23.
Пак там, с. 26.
Nicolson, H. Peacemaking 1919, 32–33.
Gertsov, Z. M. „Neytralitet“ SShA v godы Pervoy mirovoy voynы. M., 1962; Zubok, L. Ocherk SShA. M., 1956; Yoffe, A. Missia Ruta v Rossii v 1917 godu. – Voprosы istorii, 1958, № 9.
Ushakov, A. Diplomatia Vudro Vilsona. M., 1989.
Petkov, P. SASht, Svetovnata voyna i mirnata programa na prezidenta Udrou Uilsan. – GSU. IF, 89–90, 1996–1997. S., 2000.
Pantev, A. „Spetsialnite otnoshenia“ mezhdu Anglia i SASht po vreme na Parvata svetovna voyna. – Istoria i obshtestvoznanie, 1986, № 2.
Genov, G. Nyoyskiyat dogovor i Bulgaria. S., 1935; Hristov, H. Bulgaria, Balkanite i mirat 1919. S., 1984; Pantev, A., P. Petkov. SASht i Bulgaria po vreme na Parvata svetovna voyna. S., 1983; Petkov, P. The United States and Bulgaria in World War I. New York, 1991.
Pantev, A. Strategicheski proekt za vanshnata politika na SASht v kraya na XIX – nachaloto na HH vek. – GSU. IF, 75, 1982; Petkov, P. Osnovni doktrini v amerikanskata vanshna politika v kraya na XVIII i nachaloto na XIX vek. – Istoria i obshtestvoznanie, 1988, № 5–6, 90–103; Novi aktsenti v amerikanskata vanshna politika ot Grazhdanskata voyna do Parvata svetovna voyna. – Istoria, 1996, № 3–4.
Rubinshteyn, E. Krushenie Avstro-Vengerskoy monarhii. M., 1963.
Traynin, I. P. Natsionalynыe protivorechia v Avstro-Vengrii i ee raspad. M., 1947.
Baeva, I. Monarhii-respubliki v Iztochna Evropa prez HH v. – Istoricheski pregled, 2003, № 1–2.
Mishev, R. Istoria na Avstro-Ungaria, 1867–1918. V. Tarnovo, 2005.
Tomovska, T. Nazad kam izgubenia gr. S., 1996.
Dincheva, D. Voynata, revolyutsiyata, granitsite (Tsentralna Evropa 1914–1920). Sluchayat s Polsha. – Istoricheski pregled, 1998, № 1–2, s. 82.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Annual of Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" - Faculty of History (GSU-IF).
